Skip to content

Why EffectiV · The business case for air mixing

The coldest houris the most expensive one.

Better air mixing recovers a share of the heating, and heating follows the cold. The recovered energy is therefore concentrated in the coldest hours: the hours dynamic tariffs charge the most, the month’s demand charge is set and the gas burns hardest. A kilowatt-hour recovered then is worth more than its average price. This page does the arithmetic on your numbers, not ours.

One winter day, hour by hour

Heating load and the critical peak hours of Wisconsin Public Service’s rate

Heating loadCritical peak hours

Hour

Outdoors

Price per kWh

vs the cheapest hour

Four tariffs

Four ways a kilowatt-hour gets priced.

What a recovered kilowatt-hour is worth depends on the hour it is recovered and on the tariff’s structure. Under a flat rate it follows the energy; under a dynamic tariff it follows the peak, and the peak is where heating concentrates.

01

Flat rate

One price all day. The recovered energy is worth the same at 3 a.m. and 7 a.m.

Savings follow the recovered energy and nothing else. This is the base case of the sketch below.

02

Critical peak pricing

Utilities call events on the coldest mornings and evenings. Wisconsin Public Service’s residential rate bills about $1.30/kWh in a critical peak hour against 7.3 ¢ off-peak, up to 50 hours a year; Hydro-Québec’s Rate Flex D about 46 ¢ against under 9 ¢, up to 120 hours a winter.

Event hours are the coldest mornings and evenings: exactly the hours when the heating load, and with it the recovered energy, is highest.

03

Time-of-use

Xcel Energy’s Colorado residential rate: about 10 ¢/kWh off-peak and 17 ¢ on-peak in winter, with the on-peak window on weekday evenings (5–9 p.m. since 2025). Ontario’s Ultra-Low Overnight plan runs from 3.9 ¢ overnight to 39.1 ¢ on weekday evenings.

The winter evening on-peak window coincides with the afternoon warm-up and the falling outdoor temperature. The share of the value in peak hours exceeds the share of the energy.

04

Demand charge

Most commercial tariffs bill the month’s highest 15-minute demand in kW. Lowering the heating demand in the coldest hour lowers the whole month’s charge.

A single quarter-hour sets the month’s demand charge, and in winter that quarter-hour is the coldest one. Lowering the heating demand then is paid back twelve times a year.

The design day

A design day, hour by hour.

One winter day in a heated building. The lime area is the heating load, which follows the outdoor temperature. The bright band on top is the heating a better air distribution recovers: you set that share yourself. The red hours are the tariff’s peak hours, when a kilowatt-hour costs the most, and the recovered energy that falls in them is drawn in red. Enter your building’s peak heating load and the tiles do the day’s arithmetic on your numbers.

Utilities call events on the coldest mornings and evenings. Wisconsin Public Service’s residential rate bills about $1.30/kWh in a critical peak hour against 7.3 ¢ off-peak, up to 50 hours a year; Hydro-Québec’s Rate Flex D about 46 ¢ against under 9 ¢, up to 120 hours a winter.

Heating loadRecovered by better mixingRecovered in the peak hoursPrice

Heating recovered today

Saved today under this tariff

Of which during the peak hours

What a recovered kilowatt-hour is worth

Demand lowered in the coldest quarter-hour

Conceptual illustration only. It shows the principle, not a measurement: real temperatures, airflows and air quality vary from one room, system and building to the next. Model: a sinusoidal outdoor temperature around a design day, heating load proportional to the indoor–outdoor difference with a night setback and a morning warm-up. Prices are the published residential structures named above, used as examples of dynamic pricing; commercial contracts differ. The day’s figures use your peak load and your recovered share. For electric heating (resistance, heat pumps, dual-energy). With gas, the same hours are where the gas burns and the carbon is emitted.

The payback sketch

A payback sketch on your own numbers.

Nothing here is a claim. Enter your heating cost, the part of it that serves high-ceiling spaces, the share you expect better mixing to recover, and a carbon price. The sketch does the arithmetic, then draws the payback across the whole range of estimates. For a specific room, Verified quantifies the airflow and Ez terms by simulation.

Heating source

Grid

Heating energy recovered per year

Energy savings per year

Emissions avoided per year

Carbon value per year

Simple payback

Payback against the recovered share · the dot is your estimate; the curve covers 2 to 30 %

Verified

Your inputs, not a measurement or a promise. The arithmetic is transparent and contains no EffectiV figure. Real savings depend on your building, its equipment and its tariff. Simple payback = net project cost ÷ (energy savings + carbon value), at the average energy price: the peak and demand premiums above come on top. Published work on destratification in warm-air heated high-bay buildings reports savings in the order of 20 % of heating energy (Carbon Trust); your building’s number depends on its ceiling height, heaters, envelope and schedule.

Money on the table

Incentives pay part of the fix; carbon raises the cost of the problem.

Incentives, carbon pricing and penalties enter the sketch through two sliders: the incentive on the project and the carbon price. Figures as of October 2026; check the current programs.

United States

utility programs

Utility and state efficiency programs continue after the federal 179D deduction ended for construction begun after June 30, 2026; amounts vary by utility and often cover custom measures.

Hydro-Québec

Efficient Solutions

Energy-efficiency measures in medium and large businesses can receive up to 75 % of eligible costs; up to 90 % for small businesses.

California–Québec

carbon price

Allowances on the joint cap-and-trade market sold for US$28.32 (C$39.64) per tonne at the November 2025 auction, a cost that flows into gas and fuel bills.

New York City

LL97 penalty

Above its annual limit, a building over 25,000 ft² pays US$268 per metric ton of CO₂e. For a building over the limit, every tonne avoided is worth that penalty.

Go further

The carbon, and the physics behind the page.

SelectiV · Verified

Designing a room? Start with the air.

Use SelectiV to lay out diffusers in 3D, or ask for a Verified CFD study to validate comfort, IAQ and energy before anything is installed.